Skip to content
Compounder

Natera Inc

Held by 4 superinvestors (NTRA).

Educational data only — not investment advice. 13F positions are self-reported and can lag up to 45 days.

Valuation

Valuation · two methods

Earnings Power & Asset Floor

Two intrinsic-value methods and a tangible asset floor — deterministic, not price forecasts or recommendations.

Graham earnings-power value (normalized NOPAT) Normalized operating earnings net of maintenance capex are non-positive over the years shown; earnings power cannot be capitalized.Buffett owner-earnings value Normalized owner earnings are non-positive over the years shown; earnings power cannot be capitalized.
Reproduction value $18.41 / shMoat Below asset base (directional)

Zero-growth intrinsic ranges and a tangible asset floor — not investment advice, not a buy/sell signal, and not a price target.

Method & numbers

· reproduction $18.41

Moat Below asset base.

Graham earnings-power value (normalized NOPAT)

Normalized operating earnings net of maintenance capex are non-positive over the years shown; earnings power cannot be capitalized.

Normalized NOPAT = average operating margin over the years shown × latest-year revenue × (1 − normalized tax); then + D&A − maintenance capex (write A). Unlevered (pre-interest, attributable to all capital). Capitalized at the 9–11% rate band (read as a WACC proxy). Enterprise → equity bridge applied: + cash − total debt.

Years: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021

v1 simplifications: Maintenance capex (ok) deducted in full cash (write A): EPV = (NOPAT + D&A − maintenance capex) / WACC; no tax shield on the capex term. Capex doubled within two years (AI-hog rule): maintenance capex floored at 50% of current capex; EPV is correspondingly pressed down. Capex doubled within two years (AI-hog rule): flagged; the spike is treated as growth, not maintenance — owner earnings carry extra uncertainty. Share-based compensation is left as a real expense (not added back).

Buffett owner-earnings value

Normalized owner earnings are non-positive over the years shown; earnings power cannot be capitalized.

Owner earnings = average net income + average D&A − maintenance capex (zero-growth floor; no ΔNWC). Levered (starts from net income, already after interest — an equity-holder stream). Capitalized at the 9–11% rate band (read as a cost-of-equity proxy). No enterprise→equity bridge: the capitalized result is already equity value (subtracting debt would double-count interest).

Years: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021

v1 simplifications: Owner earnings = net income + D&A − maintenance capex (ok); the working-capital change is excluded (maintenance ΔNWC ≈ 0; growth ΔNWC is carried in growth value, not double-counted). Capex doubled within two years (AI-hog rule): maintenance capex floored at 50% of current capex. One-time items are not separately normalized (multi-year averaging smooths them partially). Share-based compensation is left as a real expense (not added back); see the SBC/OE disclosure. Capitalized at the same 9–11% band as a cost-of-equity proxy (theoretically the cost of equity is higher; v2 simplification, v3 to refine).

Reproduction value = tangible net assets $1.20B + capitalized R&D $1.32B(FY 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021) = $18.41 / sh. Reproduction value = tangible net assets (equity − goodwill − intangibles) + capitalized R&D (5y straight-line), ÷ diluted shares.

Moat reading: Franchise test compares earnings power (EPV) against reproduction value (tangible net assets + capitalized R&D). EPV well above reproduction value signals a moat; near it, a commodity; below it, value destruction. A directional reading, not a verdict.

Growth value gated to zero — no moat / ROIIC ≤ WACC, so no growth value is credited.

Window FY 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 · discount band 9%11% · normalized tax 4% (Average effective tax rate over 5 year(s), capped at the statutory 21%.) · diluted shares.

Ownership · 13F consensus

Who's buying it

Institutional ownership aggregated across funds — consensus strength and this quarter's moves. Describes actions, not advice.

4 superinvestors hold it · $852.3M combined

This quarter1 opened2 added1 trimmed

Largest holder Stanley Druckenmiller

Held by 4 superinvestors of Natera Inc (NTRA); this quarter 1 opened, 2 added, 1 trimmed (as of 2026-03-31).

13F positions are self-reported and can lag up to 45 days. Informational only — not investment advice.

Next · is it cheap

Want to see which stocks look cheap against a conservative value band?

Browse all valued stocks, ranked by value band

Superinvestors Holding This Security

Ownership overview

Natera Inc (NTRA) is held by 4 of the superinvestors tracked on Compounder, with a combined $852.3M in reported 13F value. The largest position belongs to Stanley Druckenmiller, where it makes up 18.1% of the portfolio.

Other notable holders by value include Lee Ainslie (2.7% of its book), Ray Dalio (0.0% of its book) and Polen Capital (0.0% of its book).

Over the latest quarter, 1 of the tracked filers opened a new position in NTRA, 2 added to existing ones, 1 trimmed, and 0 sold out entirely.

Holder counts and values reflect the most recent SEC Form 13F filings, through the quarter ended 2026-03-31. Source: SEC EDGAR. A 13F shows only long US-listed positions and can lag the real portfolio by up to 45 days, so this is disclosed long ownership, not a complete picture.

Holders over time

Superinvestors holding this security over the last 8 quarters: 2 → 4.

Early quarters may understate holder counts due to data backfill — read the slope with care.

Key facts & links

Ticker
NTRA
Total value held
$852.3M
Largest holder
Stanley Druckenmiller
External

Sources· SEC EDGAR 13F as of 2026-03-31 · filed 2026-05-15

Stay Updated

Curated 13F moves and valuation insights, straight to your inbox.