Intercontinental Exchange In
ICEAbove valueHeld by 8 superinvestors.
SEC 10-K · fundamentals
Business quality
as of 2025-12-31Valuation basis: trailing twelve months to 2026-06-30 — latest 10-K plus unaudited 10-Q filings.
- Revenue growth
- +7.5%
- Net margin
- 26.2%
- ROE
- 11.5%
- FCF margin
- 33.9%
Valuation · value band
Above fair value
Zero-growth floor
$29
Central IV
$41
Optimistic top
$47
Intercontinental Exchange In (ICE): A conservative value band $29–$47 / sh (zero-growth floor to growth-capped optimistic top); central read about $41. Today’s price sits above that band (price $162 as of 2026-08-26).
The middle figure is the main read. The right end is the optimistic case under the same conservative caps — not an absolute ceiling.
- Capex doubled in two years, so maintenance is hard to pin down — read the band conservatively.
- Recent earnings are below the multi-year average, so the band uses the lower run-rate.
Revenue growth 0% (history declining, capped at zero) · moat 10 yr · discount 12.5% · Zero-growth downside $29
Price as of 2026-08-26 · yahoo · DGS10 4.7% @ 2026-08-26.
Method & numbers
Model cautions
- Capex doubled within two years: maintenance is floored then capped at D&A (OE may look optimistic); Greenwald growth value is closed — growth credit stays in the owner-earnings DCF only.
A conservative intrinsic-value band (zero-growth floor to growth-capped DCF) plus a tangible asset floor — not investment advice, not a buy/sell signal, and not a price target.
Owner-earnings DCF $36.53 – $45.86 · Greenwald zero-growth $46.53 · zero-growth base $46.53 · reproduction $12.01
Moat Franchise (moat) · terminal value 31% of present value · owner-earnings yield 3% vs 10Y 4.7%.
Graham earnings-power value (normalized NOPAT)$29.42 – $43.81 / sh
Normalized NOPAT = average operating margin over the years shown × latest-year revenue × (1 − normalized tax); then + D&A − maintenance capex (write A). Unlevered (pre-interest, attributable to all capital). Capitalized at the 9–11% rate band (read as a WACC proxy). Enterprise → equity bridge applied: + cash − total debt.
Years: TTM 2026-06-30, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021
v1 simplifications: Maintenance capex (degraded) deducted in full cash (write A): EPV = (NOPAT + D&A − maintenance capex) / WACC; no tax shield on the capex term. Only one maintenance-capex method available; estimate is degraded. Capex doubled within two years (AI-hog rule): flagged; the spike is treated as growth, not maintenance — owner earnings carry extra uncertainty. Share-based compensation is left as a real expense (not added back).
Buffett owner-earnings value$39.35 – $46.53 / sh
Owner earnings = average net income + average D&A − maintenance capex (zero-growth floor; no ΔNWC). Levered (starts from net income, already after interest — an equity-holder stream). Capitalized at the 11.0–13.0% band (9–11% base + 2.0pp leverage premium). No enterprise→equity bridge: the capitalized result is already equity value (subtracting debt would double-count interest).
Years: TTM 2026-06-30, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021
v1 simplifications: Owner earnings = net income + D&A − maintenance capex (degraded); the working-capital change is excluded (maintenance ΔNWC ≈ 0; growth ΔNWC is carried in growth value, not double-counted). Only one maintenance-capex method available; estimate is degraded. Capex doubled within two years (AI-hog rule): flagged; the spike is treated as growth, not maintenance — owner earnings carry extra uncertainty. One-time items are not separately normalized (multi-year averaging smooths them partially). Share-based compensation is left as a real expense (not added back); see the SBC/OE disclosure. Capitalized at the 9–11% base band plus a 2.0pp leverage premium (cost of equity rises with leverage — MM Proposition II). Net debt is about 6.9 years of owner earnings, adding 2.0pp of cost-of-equity risk premium.
Asset floor: Reproduction value = tangible net assets + acquired-intangible reset proxy, ÷ diluted shares; tangible net assets alone are negative for this asset-light franchise (no R&D history to capitalize).
Moat reading: Franchise test compares earnings power (EPV) against reproduction value (tangible net assets + capitalized R&D). EPV well above reproduction value signals a moat; near it, a commodity; below it, value destruction. A directional reading, not a verdict.
Assumes a narrow moat · competitive-advantage period ≈ 10 years.
Growth value gated to zero — capex doubled within two years (AI-hog); growth credit stays in the owner-earnings DCF only.
Window TTM 2026-06-30, FY 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 · discount band 9%–11% · normalized tax 21% (Average effective tax rate over 5 year(s), capped at the statutory 21%.) · diluted shares.
Baseline 9%–11%, net debt ≈ 6.9 years of owner earnings → +2.0pp cost-of-equity premium → effective 11.0%–13.0%.
Owner-earnings DCF: growth g₁ 0% (history declining → capped at 0) · OE FY TTM 2026-06-30, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 · Discount band: 11.12%–13.96% (DGS10 +4.5% to a 12% strict end, each +1.96pp for leverage premium, as of 2026-08-26). No enterprise→equity bridge: owner earnings already flow to shareholders (post-interest), so no net cash is added and no debt subtracted — matching the engine owner-earnings lamp.
Valuation basis: trailing twelve months to 2026-06-30 — latest 10-K plus unaudited 10-Q filings.
What the price is betting
Today's price pencils in about 28.0% a year in owner-earnings for the next few years. Revenue actually grew 8.7% a year.
The market wants it well ahead of its own track record.
Even when the value band is low-confidence: use this to see what the price assumes — not as a cheapness confirmation.
SEC 13F · holders
Superinvestors Holding This Security
8 holders · $3.03B combined · this quarter +1 opened / -0 exited
- Value$2.22BWeight (prev→now)3.4% → 3.0% ▼
- Value$341.9MWeight (prev→now)2.1% → 1.0% ▼
- Value$315.3MWeight (prev→now)6.9% → 4.9% ▼
- Value$123.5MWeight (prev→now)5.7% → 2.9% ▼
- Value$16.7MWeight (prev→now)3.1% → 2.5% ▼
- Value$4.8MWeight (prev→now)New · 0.0%
- Value$3.6MWeight (prev→now)0.0% → 0.0% ▼
- Value$494,410Weight (prev→now)0.2% → 0.2% ▼
SEC 13F · notes
Written summary
Written summary
Intercontinental Exchange In (ICE) is held by 8 of the superinvestors tracked on Compounder, with a combined $3.03B in reported 13F value. The largest position belongs to Bill Nygren, where it makes up 3.0% of the portfolio.
Other notable holders by value include Andreas Halvorsen (1.0% of its book), Ruane, Cunniff (Sequoia) (4.9% of its book) and Nicolai Tangen (2.9% of its book).
Over the latest quarter, 1 of the tracked filers opened a new position in ICE, 1 added to existing ones, 4 trimmed, and 0 sold out entirely.
Holder counts and values reflect the most recent SEC Form 13F filings, through the quarter ended 2026-06-30. Source: SEC EDGAR. A 13F shows only long US-listed positions and can lag the real portfolio by up to 45 days, so this is disclosed long ownership, not a complete picture.
SEC 13F · co-ownership
Also held by these investors
Investors holding Intercontinental Exchange In (ICE) also commonly hold →
- Microsoft CorpMSFT8 holders
- Visa Inc-Class A SharesV7 holders
- Schwab (Charles) CorpSCHW6 holders
- Alphabet Inc-Cl AGOOGL6 holders
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class AMETA6 holders
- Amazon.Com IncAMZN5 holders
See which stocks look cheap against a conservative value band. Browse all valued stocks
Sources· SEC EDGAR 13F as of 2026-06-30 · filed 2026-08-14
Educational data only — not investment advice. 13F positions are self-reported and can lag up to 45 days.
Stay Updated
New-quarter 13F moves and valuation updates, to your inbox.